Subject:	Yeah, I got it
Author:	drdread
Date:	12/20/2001 10:05:00 AM
Message:

I haven't had time to respond yet. Sounds like a fun trip, though...

From the specs you give, I'd try the 2272x1704 @ "Normal" compression. It would also be interesting to know how these numbers were obtained i.e. what sorts of images they were shooting at the time. JPEG compression is fairly sensitive to the complexity of the image. If you're shooting "normal" fish portraits and such, it would nice to know what sorts of yields you see...

D

Subject

Author

Date

Well, Dave, I may be done with my Auto35 soon + (9)

NLAVD

12/13/2001 5:32:06 PM

Uh...I think I found a bug + (8)

NLAVD

12/13/2001 5:35:02 PM

Bugs & more (+) (7)

drdread

12/14/2001 10:25:58 AM

NLAVD

12/14/2001 12:13:11 PM

Get out your checkbook (5)

drdread

12/17/2001 9:58:33 AM

I had the storage requirement figured a little differently + (4)

NLAVD

12/18/2001 9:46:40 AM

That should say 6 images on a 16MB at SHQ + (0)

NLAVD

12/18/2001 9:57:13 AM

Compression (2)

drdread

12/18/2001 10:02:46 AM

Here's a pretty complete breakdown of the storage capacity + (1)

NLAVD

12/19/2001 11:55:57 AM

Yeah, I got it (0)

drdread

12/20/2001 10:05:00 AM

Post a reply: